← The Saudi aviation reference, in one place.
NTSB Safety Alert SA-072 - Minding Weight and Balance
Reproduced for study. Always verify against the official GACAR at gaca.gov.sa.
SAFETY
ALERT 072 February 2018
HIGHWAY
MARINE
RAILROAD
PIPELINE
AVIATION
Minding Weight,
Maintaining Balance
Improper or Unperformed Calculations Can be Fatal
The problem
Between 2008 and 2016, the probable causes of
136 general aviation (GA) accidents were related to
pilots improperly conducting preflight performance
calculations for weight and balance or not conducting
them at all. One-third of these accidents resulted in
pilot and/or passenger deaths.
If pilots do not perform preflight calculations to verify
that their aircraft are within allowable weight and center
of gravity (CG) limits, the aircraft could be operated in
exceedance of their certificated takeoff gross weight
and/or outside CG limits.
Overloading aircraft or operating outside of the CG
limits can severely degrade an aircraft’s performance
characteristics and ultimately lead to an aerodynamic
stall and/or loss of aircraft control, typically during
takeoff or landing.
Not accounting for atmospheric conditions—such as
wind, high temperature, and high-density altitude— on
an aircraft’s performance can exacerbate the effects
of operating outside of weight and CG limits. Even if
an aircraft is under or near its maximum gross takeoff
limit, atmospheric conditions can degrade the aircraft’s
performance enough to prevent it from attaining or
maintaining a climb.Related accidents
The following examples from the National Transportation
Safety Board’s (NTSB) accident database show the diverse
circumstances under which these types of accidents
happen:
An airline transport pilot was conducting a flight from
a fishing lodge to a remote fishing location in a float-
equipped de Havilland DHC-3T (Otter) airplane, which
impacted tundra-covered terrain just after takeoff from
a lake. Three passengers were killed, the pilot and four
passengers sustained serious injuries, and two passen-
gers sustained minor injuries. According to a witness,
after liftoff, the airplane began to climb and then de -
scended. The floats struck the water, then the airplane
briefly became airborne again before crashing. The pilot
reported that, before departure, the front and center fuel
tanks were filled and that the aft fuel tank had “residu -
al” fuel. He said that he “guesstimated” the airplane’s
weight and balance before departure (he did not weigh
the cargo, obtain passenger weights, or document any
weight and balance calculations). A postaccident weight
and balance study using the passenger weights, weighed
cargo, and fuel load showed that the airplane exceeded
its maximum gross weight by about 508.6 lbs and that
the CG was 4.08 inches aft of the aft CG limit. The pilot’s
failure to determine the airplane’s actual preflight weight
and CG led to the airplane being operated outside of its
2 / NTSB Safety Alert 072 / February 2018weight and CG limits, preventing it from attaining a prop-
er airspeed and ultimately resulting in an aerodynamic stall. (ANC15FA071 )
A Robinson R22 Beta II helicopter sustained substantial
damage when it collided with rising terrain 10 miles west of its departure point (see figure 1). The private pilot sustained a serious injury, and the passenger sustained a minor injury. The pilot reported that, as he was flying the helicopter up a canyon and climbing in rising mountainous terrain, he no -
ticed a substantial tail -
wind gust, followed by a decrease in air-speed below effective translational lift. The helicopter stopped climbing, and the pi -
lot immediately made a left turn with the intention of reversing course and turning into the wind. Howev -
er, the helicopter impacted rising terrain. The investigation determined that the helicopter was operating about 30 lbs above its maximum gross weight and that the calculated density altitude was about 9,600 ft. The pilot did not know that the helicopter’s gross weight was greater than its maximum due to inadequate preflight planning. His sub -
sequent decision to attempt to climb over rising terrain in
high-density altitude conditions with a tailwind resulted in
the helicopter’s inability to maintain a positive climb rate and subsequent impact with terrain. ( GAA15LA131 )
A Beech 100 ran off the departure end of the runway during takeoff, substantially damaging the airplane (see figure 2). The airline transport pilot, copilot, and eight pas -
sengers were not injured. During the takeoff roll, the air -
plane did not accelerate as quickly as the pilot expected. When the airplane reached the last third of the runway, the pilot pulled back on the control yoke to lift the airplane off the runway, but the stall warning horn sounded. He lowered the nose, but the airplane subsequently departed the runway and impacted terrain and obstacles. The pilot reported that he knew that the total weight of the eight passengers, their bags, and the fuel caused the airplane to be overweight, but he did not complete a weight and balance form or determine the expected takeoff perfor -
mance before the flight (figure 3 shows the unweighed luggage on board the airplane). After the accident, the pi -
lot determined that the airplane was 623 lbs over its maxi -
mum gross weight. The pilot’s decision to depart knowing that the airplane was over its maximum gross takeoff weight was unsafe. Coupling that decision with the pilot’s failure to determine the expected takeoff performance re-sulted in the airplane not accelerating as expected and its subsequent runway excursion. ( CEN17LA029 )
A flight instructor and student pilot were conducting an instructional flight in an Aeronca 11AC airplane when it impacted trees at the departure end of the runway, re -
sulting in minor injuries to the student. The flight instruc -
tor reported that, during the takeoff climb from a grass runway, the “climb rate became stagnant.” He added that he instructed the student to “lower the nose slightly,” but the airplane still could not establish a “normal climb rate.” After taking over the flight controls, the flight instructor turned the airplane toward a small gap in the tree line ahead, and the airplane subsequently impacted the trees. According to the flight instructor, the airplane departed “loaded at gross weight.” The student reported that the flight instructor did not discuss the airplane’s weight and balance with him before the flight. Postaccident weight and balance calculations revealed that the airplane was 139 lbs over its maximum gross weight, and the calcu-lated density altitude was about 2,648 ft. The airplane’s overweight condition, in combination with the takeoff in
high-density altitude conditions from a turf runway, de -
creased the airplane’s takeoff performance and resulted in the accident. ( GAA17CA347 )
Figure 1. Photograph of
substantial damage to Robinson R22 Beta II helicopter
Figure 2 (top). Postaccident
photograph of damaged Beech 100
Figure 3 (at right). Photographs
showing unweighed baggage on Beech 100
NTSB Safety Alert 072 / February 2018 / 3
What can pilots do?
Know your aircraft’s limitations and the factors
that can affect its performance.
Conduct weight and balance calculations in
accordance with the applicable aircraft flight
manuals (AFM) to ensure that your aircraft is
loaded within its weight and CG limits. The
limitations section of each AFM or Pilot’s
Operating Handbook contains details about the
maximum weight and CG limits for takeoff and
landing.
Be prepared and conduct takeoff and landing
distance calculations as part of your preflight
planning. Remember to account for fuel burn
during flight, which will result in a CG shift and
decrease in weight.
Be aware of the atmospheric conditions that
exist at the time throughout your flight and
account for these factors in all your performance
calculations.
Remember that operating the aircraft above
its maximum gross weight can result in a
longer takeoff run due to the airplane’s slower
acceleration and the need for a higher takeoff
speed; shallower climb angles and reduced climb
rates; reduced cruising speed; shorter range;
higher stall speeds; and longer landing rolls.
Be aware that operating an aircraft outside of
its CG limits can degrade its handling qualities,
resulting in reduced stability and/or reduced
control authority, which increases the risk of a
loss of control. Be vigilant on every flight. Determine the CG even if your aircraft is under
its maximum gross weight. Even if an aircraft
is within its allowable gross weight, it may be
loaded outside of its CG limits.
Do not “guesstimate” passenger and cargo
weights. The margins of error are small, and even
slightly underestimating these weights could kill
or seriously injure you, a friend or colleague, or a
family member.
When using automated weight and balance
application calculators, ensure that the basic
empty weight and moment match the specific
values for your aircraft. Sample weight and
balance data should never be used as a substitute
for actual numbers in the AFM.
If any major modifications to your aircraft change
its weight or CG, such as the installation of
onboard equipment, ensure that this information
is in the updated weight and balance forms
contained in the AFM.
Remember that aircraft performance can only be
determined after the gross weight is computed.
Professional flight crews do these computations
routinely. You should strive for professionalism
as well when you are planning your flights.
REMEMBER — Before Every Flight,
Ensure That Your Aircraft
Can Operate Safely
4 / NTSB Safety Alert 072 / February 2018Interested in more information?
Education and training are essential to improving GA
safety. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Safety
Team (FAASTeam ) provides access to online training
courses, seminars, and webinars as part of the FAA’s
“WINGS—Pilot Proficiency Program.” The program
includes targeted flight training designed to help pilots
develop the knowledge and skills needed to achieve
flight proficiency and to assess and mitigate the risks
associated with the most common causes of accidents,
including operating outside of weight and CG limits. The
courses and resources listed below (among others),
as well as seminar and webinar information, can be
accessed from the FAASTeam website at account or
creation of a free FAASTeam account.)
• Performance Limitations
• Helicopter – Weight & Balance, Performance
• Weight and Balance P-8740-05FAA-H-8083-1, “ Weight and Balance Handbook,” and
FAA-H-8083-21A, “ Helicopter Flying Handbook ” both
provide pilots with information on loading and operating
aircraft and emphasize the importance of ensuring
that the weight and CG are within the allowable limits.
The handbooks also describe the negative effects of
overloading an aircraft and operating an aircraft outside
of CG limits. The handbooks provide exemplar loading
computations for GA aircraft and corresponding loading
graphs and tables of weight and moment indexes. Both
handbooks can be accessed from the FAA’s website at
www.faa.gov.
A companion video to this safety alert can be accessed
from the Aviation Safety Alerts link.
The reports for the accidents referenced in this safety
alert are accessible by NTSB accident number from the
Aviation Accident Database link, and each accident’s
public docket is accessible from the Accident Dock ets
link for the Docket Management System.
The NTSB’s Aviation Information Resources web page, www.ntsb.gov/air ,
provides convenient access to NTSB aviation safety products. This Safety
Alert and others can be accessed from the Aviation Safety Alerts link at
www.ntsb.gov .
The NTSB is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation
accident in the United States and significant accidents in other modes of transportation—highway, marine,
railroad, and pipeline. The NTSB determines the probable cause of the accidents and issues safety
recommendations aimed at preventing future accidents. For more information, visit www.ntsb.gov .www.twitter.com/ ntsb
www.facebook.com/ ntsbgov
www.youtube.com/ user/ ntsbgov
www.instagram.com/ ntsbgov
www.flickr.com/photos/ ntsb
Fly GACA is an independent educational platform. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the General Authority of Civil Aviation (GACA) or the Government of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The official and authoritative source for all civil aviation regulations, publications, and aeronautical information is always GACA. Always verify against the latest official GACA publication at gaca.gov.sa.