← The Saudi aviation reference, in one place.
NTSB Safety Alert SA-067 - Flying on Empty
Reproduced for study. Always verify against the official GACAR at gaca.gov.sa.
SAFETY
ALERT 067 August 2017
Flying on Empty
Prevent the Preventable with Careful Fuel
Management
The problem:
Within fuel-related accidents, fuel exhaustion and fuel starvation continue to be leading
causes. From 2011 to 2015, an average of more than 50 accidents per year occurred due to fuel
management issues. Fuel exhaustion accounted for 56% of fuel-related accidents while fuel starvation was responsible for 35% of these accidents.
Figure 1. Top Ten General Aviation Accident Occurrence Categories, 2011–2015
HIGHWAY
MARINE
RAILROAD
PIPELINE
AVIATION
Loss of Control In-Flight
System/Component Failure – Powerplant
Loss of Control on Ground
Abnormal Runway Contact
System/Component Failure – Non-Power
Fuel Related
Controlled Flight Into Terrain
Runway Excursion
Low Altitude Operation
Collision on Takeoff or LandingTotal
Fatal
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Accidents
2 / NTSB Safety Alert 067 / August 2017 Fuel exhaustion is running out of fuel whereas fuel
starvation is having fuel onboard but it doesn’t reach the
engine for reasons such as a blockage, improperly set
fuel selector, or water contamination.
• M ore than 66% of fuel management accidents occurred
on flights when the intended destination airport was dif -
ferent than the departure airport. About 80% of all fuel
management accidents occurred during the day in visual
meteorological conditions; only 15% occurred at night.
• Almost half of pilots involved in fuel management ac -
cidents hold either a commercial or air transport pilot
certificate (48%); pilots holding private or sport pilot
certificates make up 50%. Only 2% of accidents involved
student pilots.
• Pilot complacency and overestimation of flying ability
can play a role in fuel management accidents.
Running out of fuel or starving an engine of fuel is highly preventable.
• A n overwhelming majority of our investigations of fuel management accidents—95%— cited personnel issues (such as
use of equipment, planning, or experience in the type of aircraft being flown) as causal or contributing to fuel exhaustion or starvation accidents. Prudent pilot action can eliminate these issues. Less than 5% of investigations cited a failure or malfunction of the fuel system.
Related accidents:
The NTSB has investigated numerous accidents involving fuel exhaustion or starvation, such as the following:
The commercial pilot of a Beech 19A reported that,
during the initial climb after takeoff for the flight, which was the first flight after completion of an annual inspec -
tion, the engine lost power at an altitude of about 500 ft.
He made a left turn to return to the airport but instead
touched down hard next to the runway. During the annual inspection, maintenance personnel had placed the fuel selector valve in the OFF position and did not return it to the full-ON position before the flight. The pilot reported
that he and the owner usually kept the fuel selector valve
in the ON position and that he did not use a checklist or confirm that it was in the full-ON position before takeoff. The probable cause of the accident was the pilot's fail-
ure to reposition the fuel selector valve to the ON posi-
tion prior to takeoff resulting in a loss of engine power due to fuel starvation. Contributing to the accident was
the pilot's failure to properly complete the pre-takeoff
checklist. (WPR16CA145 )
The private pilot of a Piper PA-24-250 reported that, be -
fore departure, the airplane’s digital cockpit fuel gauges indicated that the two wing tanks contained about 5 gal -
lons of fuel each for the 10- to 15-minute flight. About 4 miles from the destination airport, the engine began to run roughly, and the pilot switched the fuel tank se-lector from the left-wing tank to the right-wing tank. The engine continued to run roughly and subsequently lost
all power. Postaccident examination found that the fuel
quantity gauges indicated no fuel remained, and no fuel was observed in either of the wing fuel tanks. Given the fuel consumption rate in the airplane’s Pilot Operating
Handbook (POH), a 15-minute flight would have con-
sumed about 3.5 gallons, not including the fuel required for engine startup, taxi, and takeoff. The pilot used the Figure 2. Accidents Involving Fuel Management from 2011
to 20152011General Aviation Fuel Exhaustion and Fuel Starvation
Accidents, 2011–2015
0102030405060Accidents70
2012 2013 2014 2015
NTSB Safety Alert 067 / August 2017 / 3digital cockpit fuel gauges as his only indication of the
fuel level and did not confirm the displayed quantity ei-ther visually or with another fuel measurement device
before takeoff. The probable cause of the accident was
the pilot’s improper preflight inspection, which result-
ed in fuel exhaustion and a total loss of engine power. (ERA13LA408 )
About 10 minutes into the flight, the private pilot of a
Cirrus SR22T reported to an air traffic controller that the engine was running rough and that he needed to return to his departure airport. During a second instrument ap-
proach, the engine lost power, and the pilot attempted a
forced landing to a field, where the airplane came to rest on its right side. The pilot and one passenger sustained serious injuries, and a second passenger sustained fatal injuries. No evidence of fuel or fuel spillage was observed at the accident site. An examination and operational test
of the engine found no defects in engine operation, and
the engine produced full-rated power. According to the pi-lot, the airplane’s management company did not fuel the airplane as he had requested. The pilot did not visually
verify the fuel level in the tanks during his preflight in -
spection and departed with his flight displays indicating
low fuel alerts. The probable cause of the accident was the pilot's failure to adequately preflight the airplane prior to departure, which resulted in a loss of engine
power due to fuel exhaustion. (CEN12FA037 )
What can you do?
Know how much fuel y ou have onboard AT ALL TIMES.
During y our preflight inspection, measure and/or visually confirm the fuel quantity in your
tanks. Do not rely exclusively on fuel gauges.
Know how much fuel y ou will need for a given flight.
Mak e sure you have a fuel reserve for each flight.
Know y our engine’s fuel burn rate and actively monitor the fuel burn rate for the entire time
the engine is operating.
Know y our aircraft’s fuel system and how it works.
Re view your aircraft’s POH and use the appropriate checklists.
Don ’t stretch your available fuel supply. Stop and get gas!Figure 3. Exemplar
fuel gauges and postaccident fuel
samples
4 / NTSB Safety Alert 067 / August 2017Interested in more information?
The following links are to recent articles and other resources about
fuel management:
The March 2017 issue of NASA’s newsletter CALLBACK contains
an article about complacency in aviation that discusses a pilot who was complacent in using checklist procedures and starved the engine of fuel.
The fuel management edition of AOPA’s Safety Advisor provides
pilots detailed information and suggestions to improve fuel awareness and reduce fuel-related incidents.
The January 2017 issue of Aviation Safety magazine contains an
article titled, “ Fuel Systems 101,” which discusses how most fuel
management accidents result from pilots’ poor planning or failure to understand how aircraft fuel systems deliver fuel to the engine.
The reports for the accidents referenced in this safety alert are accessible by NTSB accident number from the Aviation Accident
Database link, and each accident’s public docket is accessible from
the Accident Dockets link for the Docket Management System.
The NTSB is an independent federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant accidents in other modes of transportation—highway, marine, railroad and pipeline. The NTSB determines the probable cause of the accidents and issues safety recommendations aimed at preventing future accidents. For more information, visit www.ntsb.gov
The NTSB’s Aviation Information Resources web page, www.ntsb.gov/air ,
provides convenient access to NTSB aviation safety products. This Safety Alert and others can be accessed from the Aviation Safety Alerts link at
www.ntsb.gov .www.twitter.com/ntsb
www.facebook .com/ntsbgov
www.youtube.com/user/ ntsbgov
www.instagram.com/ntsbgov
www.flickr.com/photos/ ntsb
Fly GACA is an independent educational platform. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the General Authority of Civil Aviation (GACA) or the Government of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The official and authoritative source for all civil aviation regulations, publications, and aeronautical information is always GACA. Always verify against the latest official GACA publication at gaca.gov.sa.