← The Saudi aviation reference, in one place.
NTSB Safety Alert SA-051 - Line Personnel Fueling Matters
Reproduced for study. Always verify against the official GACAR at gaca.gov.sa.
Figure 2. Photograph of Jet A fuel nozzle.
Figure 1. Photograph of an avgas nozzle.
Line Personnel: Fueling Matters
Prevent misfueling through standardize d procedures for every aircraft
The problem
Misfueling can occur for a variety of reasons and typically results in a complete loss of
engine power, which may lead to serious injuries and/or death.
• While f uel nozzles and fuel fillers are
designed to prevent misfueling , our
investigations have found numerous
modifications that can allow misfueling to occur . For example, aviation
gasoline (avgas ) nozzles are small and
round and fit into smaller opening fuel
filler ports while jet fuel nozzles are
larger and flattened like a duck’s bill ,
requiring a larger fuel filler port (see
figures 1 and 2) . However, our
investigations have shown that some
fixed base operators (FBOs) are modifying their jet fuel nozzles with the smaller avgas nozzles or other smaller
type nozzle, such as the round jet spout nozzle, to more easily fuel
smaller turbine helicopters. These
non-standard jet fuel nozzles can
easily fit into the smaller filler ports of
aircraft that require avgas and allow for
misfueling to occur .
• When an aircraft is modified from using a reciprocating engine (avgas) to
a turbine engine (jet fuel), some supplemental type certificates (STCs) have not required that the fuel filler port size be changed accordingly . As a result, line personnel have had to make
accommodations such as installing an avgas fuel nozzle or round jet nozzle on a jet
fuel truck to allow jet fuel into the smaller avgas fuel filler port . These STC
SA-051 March 2016 modifications can lead to fueling confusion because the same model or similar
looking aircraft may now have different fuel requirements.
• Once the wrong fuel is pumped into an aircraft , identifying that misfueling has
occu rred can be difficult, if not impossible, to detect.
Related accidents and incidents
The NTSB has investigated accidents involving misfueling, and they show the importance of
pilots and line personnel maintaining vigilance when aircraft are fueled. The following accident summaries help to highlight the issues involved:
• During takeoff , both engines of a Cessna 421C los t power . The airline transport pilot
and two passengers sustained minor injuries in the forced landing. The pilot had
landed the previous night and requested that 40 gallons of fuel be added to each
tank. Line personnel incorrectly fueled the airplane with Jet A fuel by rotating the jet
fuel nozzle and dispensing at a reduced pressure so that the fuel would go into the
avgas fuel port because they had used th is procedure on two other airplanes that had
been modified with turbine engines and were based at the airport. However, t he STC
for the modification did not require that the airplanes’ fuel filler openings be modified
to the standard Jet A nozzle. ( CEN09 LA145
)
• During climbout, a Cessna 421B’s engines lost power. The pilot was seriously injured
and two passengers sustained minor injuries during a forced landing. The pilot had requested that the airplane’s tip tanks be topped off with fuel the day before . The fuel
tanks were placarded for avgas . However, line personnel mistook the airplane for a
similar airplane that required Jet A fuel and refueled it from a Jet A fuel truck that had
been permanently modified with a round nozzle to provide easier access for other aircraft serviced at the airport. The round nozzle also fit the avgas filler port opening
of the Cessna. Before departure, the pilot sumped the fuel and it appeared that the
airplane had been correctly fueled; however, he signed a receipt indicating that the
airplane had been refueled with Jet A. (CEN15LA199
)
• During climbout, the engine of a Canadian -registered Piper PA 46 -350P requiring
avgas lost power , and the pilot was fatally injured during the attempted emergency
landing. A fuel log showed that the airplane had been incorrectly refueled with Jet A
before takeoff. ( WPR15LA111 )
• During the initial climb, both engines of a Cessna 421C lost power . The pilot, two
medical crewmembers, and one patient were fatally injured following impact with
terrain . The pilot had requested that the airplane be refueled with 40 gallons of fuel.
Because the airport also serviced helicopters with smaller opening fuel filler ports that
actually required Jet A fuel, one of the nozzle s on the Jet A fuel truck had been
permanently modified with a round nozzle to provide easier access for these aircraft .
The pilot was present when the line service person incorrectly fueled the Cessna with
Jet A fuel instead of the required avgas . The pilot signed a fuel ticket indicating that
the airplane had been fueled with Jet A fuel. (CEN14FA462 )
SA-051 March 2016 What can line personnel do?
• Ensure that pilots tell you what type of fuel and the quantity are required by their
aircraft then verify that the correct fuel and quantity are being provided.
• Read and verify that fuel placards are correct. If there is a discrepancy between what
the pilot asks for and what is indicated on the placard, ASK! In addition, you can use
a fuel grade verification form signed by the pilot.
• Identify aircraft through the registration number rather than the aircraft make/model.
Due to STC modifications of piston engines to turbines, be aware that even though
you have fueled an aircraft with Jet A, a similar aircraft may require avgas.
Additionally, if your airport services smaller turbine helicopters, the fuel nozzles may have been modified so that the Jet A fuel dispenser is equipped with an avgas nozzle
or round jet spout .
• Many pilots who have had misfueled aircraft have signed receipts that show the
wrong fuel was used. Use the receipt as an added safety check in verify ing with the
pilot that you provided the appropriate fuel.
Interested in more information?
• The National Air Transportation Association provides training through its Safety 1st
General Aviation Misfueling Prevention Program for pilots , line personnel , FBO
general managers, and customer service repr esentatives.
• The Twin Cessna Flyer organization wrote an article, “Misfueling Epidemic ,” in the
August 2015 issue of its magazine that discusses misfueling prevention methods.
• The FAA published Advisory Circular 20- 122A , “Anti-misfueling Devices: Their
Availability and Use .”
• The NTSB made a series of safety recommendations in the 1980s (A -82-140,
A-82-141, and A -86-135) to prevent aircraft misfueling.
The NTSB’s Aviation Information Resources web page, www.ntsb.gov/air , provides
convenient access to NTSB aviation safety products. The reports for the accidents
referenced in this safety alert are accessible by NTSB accident number from the Aviation
Accident Database link, and each accident’s public docket is accessible from the Accident
Dockets link for the Docket Management System . The safety recommendation letters
referenced in this alert can be accessed from the Safety Recommendations link. This safety
alert and others can be accessed from the Aviation Safety Alerts link.
Fly GACA is an independent educational platform. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the General Authority of Civil Aviation (GACA) or the Government of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The official and authoritative source for all civil aviation regulations, publications, and aeronautical information is always GACA. Always verify against the latest official GACA publication at gaca.gov.sa.