← The Saudi aviation reference, in one place.

NTSB5 sections

NTSB Safety Alert SA-040 - Understanding Flight Experience

Reproduced for study. Always verify against the official GACAR at gaca.gov.sa.

Ask Captain Adel about this

Understanding Flight Experience

A rating alone cannot ensure safety: Training is key

The problem

 Aircraft have different flight characteristics, performance, and systems.

 Pilots may have many hours of experience, but their experience specific to the

aircraft make/model and/or equipment they are flying may be limited.

 Although Federal Aviation Administratio n (FAA) regulations allow pilots to operate

aircraft that are designated by a specific category and class, differences among

different types of aircraft within the same category and class can be significant.

 Even if operating a specific type of aircraft is allowed by regulations, it does not mean

the practice is safe.

Related accidents

The NTSB has investigated many accidents in which pilots who met the minimum federal

requirements for flight ultimately did not have adequate experience and/or training in the

aircraft they were flying to operate it safely or to deal with an inflight emergency. The

following accident summaries illustrate some common —and preventable —accident

scenarios :

 A 15,150 -hour airline transport pilot was fatally injured after losing control of a

recently purchased Beechcraft KingAir B200GT airplane shortly after departure. The

pilot had previously flown another similar model airplane and obtained about

5,075 hours, but the airplane was slightly older and had a different avionics package;

the accident airplane’s avionics and flight management system were new to the pilot.

During a ferry flight just before the accident, a passen ger who was also a pilot was

pointing out the avionics features of the new airplane. Due to the pilot’s unfamiliarity

with the avionics, he allowed the airplane to slow and then descend into a house

during departure. (CEN13FA326 )

 A 16,000 -hour airline transport pilot was conducting the Phase I flight test of the

experimental Mustang II tailwheel airplane and lost directional control. He had

2,130 hours in single -engine airplanes, and 10 hours in the make and model airplane.

He had accrued 6 hours in tailwheel -configured airplanes in the 3 months before the

SA-040 March 2015 , reviewed December 2015 accident. Although the pilot had thousands of flight hours, his lack of experience in

the accident airplane made him more susceptible to losing control of the airplane.

(CEN10LA255 )

 During a water landing in a Quest Aircraft Company Kodiak 100, a 1,650 -hour

commercial pilot, with 550 hours in seaplanes and 232 hours in the accident airplane

lost directional control. The pilot had completed one 180 -degree step turn during her

initial training, but she had not performed any during her interagency pilot

evalu ation/qualification check even though it was required. If the pilot had received

thorough training in performing step turns in the accident make and model airplane,

she would have been less likely to lose control of the airplane. ( ANC12GA114 )

 A private pilot was fatally injured following a loss of engine power from a Cessna

P337H airplane’s rear engine. The pilot had obtained a private pilot certificate in 1998

and, o ver the next 15 years, accrued minimal flight experience, with a total flight time

leading up to the accident of 118 hours. About 1 month before the accident, he

obtained a multiengine rating. His total multiengine time was 40 hours, with 18 hours

in the a ccident airplane; only 3 hours were acting as pilot -in-command. The pilot’s

extended absence from flying, minimal total flight time, and limited experience in

high-performance multiengine airplanes made him more vulnerable to errors when

addressing the los s of engine power. (WPR13FA289 )

What can pilots do?

 Obtain the necessary training from a flight instructor experienced in the aircraft that

you plan to fly so that you understand the flight characteristics and emergency

procedures for th at aircraft. Meeting the minimum requirements does not mean that

you are proficient.

 Obtain refresher train ing if you have not flown for a long period; long periods of no

flying, even for high -time pilots, can have an adverse impact on your ability to

respond to unusual situations and emergencies.

 Seek out a qualified test pilot to assist in flight testing home built aircraft you are not

familiar with.

 Seek out instruction for advanced avionics and systems. Identical make -and-model

aircraft can have considerably different cockpit panels.

Interested in more information?

The reports for the accidents referenced in this safety alert are accessible by NTSB accident

number from the NTSB’s Aviation Accident Database & Synopses web page at

http://www.ntsb.gov /_layouts/ntsb.aviation/index.aspx . Each accident’s public docket is

accessible from the NTSB’s Docket Management System web page at

http://dms.ntsb.gov/pubdms/ .

SA-040 March 2015 , reviewed December 2015 The Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) Air Safety Institute, a division of AOPA

Foundation, offers an online educational course, Transitioning to Other Airplanes , that

provides information about transitioning to different airplanes and avionics. This course and

other safety resources can be accessed from https://www.aopa.org/Pilot -Resources/ Air-

Safety -Institute . (Course access requires creation of a free account.)

A Personal Minimums Checklist can be a helpful tool in assessing your capabilities and

determining your readiness for flight. This information can be accessed through the FAA’s

website at www.faa.gov .

“Beyond the Buttons: Mastering Our Marvelous Flying Machines ” published by FAA Aviation

News (March/April 2007), contains valuable resources and information related to the

multiple considerations pilots must take into account when moving to glass cockpit displays.

This information can also be accessed through the FAA’s website at www.faa.gov .

In 2012, the NTSB published a study titled, The Safety Of Experimental Amateur -Built

Aircraft , that led to recommendations related to flight testing experience and using a second

qualified pilot during aircraft testing. Additionally, the NTSB published a study in 2010 titled,

Introduction of Glass Cockpit Avionics into Light Aircraft , that led to recommendations

related to pilot knowledge of aircraft equipment operations and malfunctions. These studies

can also be accessed through the NTSB’s website at http://www.ntsb.gov/safety/safety -

studies/Pages/SafetyStudies.aspx .

This NTSB safety alert and others can be accessed from the NTSB’s Safety Alerts web

page at http://www.ntsb.gov/safety/safety -alerts/Pages/default.aspx or searched from the

NTSB home page at http://www.ntsb.gov/Pages/default.aspx .

Fly GACA is an independent educational platform. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by the General Authority of Civil Aviation (GACA) or the Government of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The official and authoritative source for all civil aviation regulations, publications, and aeronautical information is always GACA. Always verify against the latest official GACA publication at gaca.gov.sa.